All configured associations have direct source support. The zones remain indicative, and each record states the limits of that support.
What is supported today
ATI monitors representative regions across Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Togo, Benin and Nigeria. Every configured region and commodity has a directly supported record in the register below. Context-only and unresolved statuses remain available when future coverage does not meet that standard. All mapped zones remain indicative.
Agronomic references explain why weather conditions may matter to a crop. Those references alone do not establish that the crop is produced in a particular region. A source naming an institution or a national industry is also insufficient to prove every regional association.
What a mapped region means
The map uses administrative boundaries and representative weather monitoring points. A shaded region is planning coverage; it is not a mapped farm, a surveyed crop boundary or evidence that production occurs throughout the shaded area.
A commodity absent from the map may simply be outside ATI’s configured coverage. Absence from the map does not establish absence of production.
How a regional claim should be supported
A defensible regional claim needs a source that explicitly connects the commodity, the place and the activity being described. Production, cultivation, census-reported farm holding, wild collection, processing and a development programme are different activities and must be described separately.
The claim-level register records the following information for accepted sources and states what is still needed for contextual or unresolved associations. Source review checks the cited passage; it is not a field survey, and its date does not make the underlying observation current.
- The exact claim, named geography and any mapping from older administrative boundaries.
- The publisher, direct source link and supporting passage, page or table.
- The observation period where stated, the access date and the review date.
- The review decision, limits of support and any unresolved or conflicting evidence.
Browse regional claims
Source-supported association means an inspected publication explicitly connects the crop and region through production, cultivation, census-reported farm holding or collection. It does not establish current output, commercial scale, farm boundaries or coverage throughout the region. Open the record for the observation period and activity.
Context only covers programme areas, older geographic names, uncertain boundary mappings or historical samples. Evidence unresolved means no accepted supporting passage is attached. These statuses describe evidence strength, not crop absence or a weather risk tier.
132 of 132 associations · 132 source-supported · 0 context only · 0 unresolved
Côte d’Ivoire
Nawa · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Conseil Café-Cacao, via the Côte d’Ivoire open-data portal
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The portal reports cocoa output in Nawa, San-Pedro, Haut-Sassandra and Indénié-Djuablin for 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: Dataset description and accompanying cocoa visualization description; regional comparisons for 2022 and 2023.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Publication date is the portal’s dataset update date. This review uses its regional description, not a re-analysis of raw records. Historical output does not establish current volumes, farm locations or production throughout a region.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Nawa · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 natural-rubber production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, Nawa, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 52 (printed p. 39), Table 17: estimated natural-rubber production by administrative region.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It does not establish later output, production throughout a region or farm locations; ATI does not reproduce the quantities as live data.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
San Pedro · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Conseil Café-Cacao, via the Côte d’Ivoire open-data portal
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The portal reports cocoa output in Nawa, San-Pedro, Haut-Sassandra and Indénié-Djuablin for 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: Dataset description and accompanying cocoa visualization description; regional comparisons for 2022 and 2023.
Geographic interpretation: San-Pedro in the source is San Pedro in the configured region; punctuation differs.
Limits: Publication date is the portal’s dataset update date. This review uses its regional description, not a re-analysis of raw records. Historical output does not establish current volumes, farm locations or production throughout a region.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
San Pedro · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 natural-rubber production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, Nawa, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 52 (printed p. 39), Table 17: estimated natural-rubber production by administrative region.
Geographic interpretation: The table uses SAN-PEDRO; the configured region uses San Pedro. This is the same administrative region with different punctuation.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It does not establish later output, production throughout a region or farm locations; ATI does not reproduce the quantities as live data.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
San Pedro · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 oil-palm fruit-bunch production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 53 (printed p. 40), Table 19: estimated production of oil-palm fruit bunches by region.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It reports fruit-bunch estimates, not planted boundaries, later output, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Haut-Sassandra · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Conseil Café-Cacao, via the Côte d’Ivoire open-data portal
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The portal reports cocoa output in Nawa, San-Pedro, Haut-Sassandra and Indénié-Djuablin for 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: Dataset description and accompanying cocoa visualization description; regional comparisons for 2022 and 2023.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Publication date is the portal’s dataset update date. This review uses its regional description, not a re-analysis of raw records. Historical output does not establish current volumes, farm locations or production throughout a region.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Indénié-Djuablin · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Conseil Café-Cacao, via the Côte d’Ivoire open-data portal
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The portal reports cocoa output in Nawa, San-Pedro, Haut-Sassandra and Indénié-Djuablin for 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: Dataset description and accompanying cocoa visualization description; regional comparisons for 2022 and 2023.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Publication date is the portal’s dataset update date. This review uses its regional description, not a re-analysis of raw records. Historical output does not establish current volumes, farm locations or production throughout a region.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Indénié-Djuablin · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 natural-rubber production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, Nawa, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 52 (printed p. 39), Table 17: estimated natural-rubber production by administrative region.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It does not establish later output, production throughout a region or farm locations; ATI does not reproduce the quantities as live data.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Indénié-Djuablin · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 oil-palm fruit-bunch production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 53 (printed p. 40), Table 19: estimated production of oil-palm fruit bunches by region.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It reports fruit-bunch estimates, not planted boundaries, later output, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Sud-Comoé · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 natural-rubber production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, Nawa, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 52 (printed p. 39), Table 17: estimated natural-rubber production by administrative region.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It does not establish later output, production throughout a region or farm locations; ATI does not reproduce the quantities as live data.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Sud-Comoé · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 oil-palm fruit-bunch production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 53 (printed p. 40), Table 19: estimated production of oil-palm fruit bunches by region.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It reports fruit-bunch estimates, not planted boundaries, later output, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
La Mé · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 natural-rubber production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, Nawa, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 52 (printed p. 39), Table 17: estimated natural-rubber production by administrative region.
Geographic interpretation: The table abbreviates the region to ME; this explicit alias is limited to the configured La Mé region.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It does not establish later output, production throughout a region or farm locations; ATI does not reproduce the quantities as live data.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
La Mé · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports 2022 and 2023 oil-palm fruit-bunch production estimates for Indénié-Djuablin, La Mé, San Pedro and Sud-Comoé.
Where to find it: PDF p. 53 (printed p. 40), Table 19: estimated production of oil-palm fruit bunches by region.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its estimates to the Rubber and Oil Palm Council (CHPH). It reports fruit-bunch estimates, not planted boundaries, later output, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Gontougo · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports cashew-nut production in Gontougo and Poro in 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: PDF p. 56 (printed p. 43), Table 23: regional distribution of cashew-nut production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its data to the Cotton and Cashew Council (CCA). Historical regional output does not establish later production, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Poro · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports cashew-nut production in Gontougo and Poro in 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: PDF p. 56 (printed p. 43), Table 23: regional distribution of cashew-nut production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its data to the Cotton and Cashew Council (CCA). Historical regional output does not establish later production, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Poro · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports seed-cotton production in Bagoué, Hambol, Poro and Tchologo for the 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 55 (printed p. 42), Table 21: regional distribution of seed-cotton production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its data to the Cotton and Cashew Council (CCA). Historical regional output does not establish later production, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Poro · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Centre de Promotion des Investissements en Côte d’Ivoire (CEPICI), Invest in Korhogo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The government-hosted catalogue says 80% of the stated national shea production is located in Poro, Tchologo, Hambol and Bagoué; ATI uses the three configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF p. 25, section 6.2: shea-production context for the proposed processing project.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The statement appears in investment-project context, gives no observation or publication date, groups four regions together and does not distinguish cultivated trees from collection of wild fruit. It does not establish current regional quantities, boundaries or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Poro · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The final report names Bagoué, Poro, Tchologo and Hambol as Côte d’Ivoire’s principal mango-producing regions; ATI uses the three configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF p. 42 (printed p. 14), section 2.3.3 and Figure 2.3.6: principal mango-producing regions.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The report was published in 2024 but its regional statement relies on older references. It does not establish current output, regional quantities, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bagoué · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports seed-cotton production in Bagoué, Hambol, Poro and Tchologo for the 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 55 (printed p. 42), Table 21: regional distribution of seed-cotton production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its data to the Cotton and Cashew Council (CCA). Historical regional output does not establish later production, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bagoué · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Centre de Promotion des Investissements en Côte d’Ivoire (CEPICI), Invest in Korhogo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The government-hosted catalogue says 80% of the stated national shea production is located in Poro, Tchologo, Hambol and Bagoué; ATI uses the three configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF p. 25, section 6.2: shea-production context for the proposed processing project.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The statement appears in investment-project context, gives no observation or publication date, groups four regions together and does not distinguish cultivated trees from collection of wild fruit. It does not establish current regional quantities, boundaries or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bagoué · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The final report names Bagoué, Poro, Tchologo and Hambol as Côte d’Ivoire’s principal mango-producing regions; ATI uses the three configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF p. 42 (printed p. 14), section 2.3.3 and Figure 2.3.6: principal mango-producing regions.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The report was published in 2024 but its regional statement relies on older references. It does not establish current output, regional quantities, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Tchologo · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports seed-cotton production in Bagoué, Hambol, Poro and Tchologo for the 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 55 (printed p. 42), Table 21: regional distribution of seed-cotton production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its data to the Cotton and Cashew Council (CCA). Historical regional output does not establish later production, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Tchologo · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Centre de Promotion des Investissements en Côte d’Ivoire (CEPICI), Invest in Korhogo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The government-hosted catalogue says 80% of the stated national shea production is located in Poro, Tchologo, Hambol and Bagoué; ATI uses the three configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF p. 25, section 6.2: shea-production context for the proposed processing project.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The statement appears in investment-project context, gives no observation or publication date, groups four regions together and does not distinguish cultivated trees from collection of wild fruit. It does not establish current regional quantities, boundaries or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Tchologo · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The final report names Bagoué, Poro, Tchologo and Hambol as Côte d’Ivoire’s principal mango-producing regions; ATI uses the three configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF p. 42 (printed p. 14), section 2.3.3 and Figure 2.3.6: principal mango-producing regions.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The report was published in 2024 but its regional statement relies on older references. It does not establish current output, regional quantities, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Hambol · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Production, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry annual reports seed-cotton production in Bagoué, Hambol, Poro and Tchologo for the 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 55 (printed p. 42), Table 21: regional distribution of seed-cotton production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table attributes its data to the Cotton and Cashew Council (CCA). Historical regional output does not establish later production, production throughout a region or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Hambol · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Hydraulics, Sanitation and Hygiene, Republic of Côte d’Ivoire, hosted by the World Bank
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The government study locates Kafiné in Niakaramadougou department within Hambol and lists sesame among food crops cultivated by women near the Kafiné reservoir.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 188–193 (printed pp. 189–194), sections 4.2.3.1–4.2.3.2: Hambol and Niakaramadougou location context, followed by “Cultures vivrières et maraichères”.
Geographic interpretation: The study locates Kafiné in Niakaramadougou department within Hambol. Cultivation near the reservoir supports an association within Hambol, not activity throughout the region.
Limits: This is qualitative evidence for cultivation in one locality within Hambol, not a regional production estimate. It provides no sesame area, output, farm boundaries or basis for inferring cultivation throughout Hambol or after the field study.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ghana
Ashanti · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero cocoa-farm counts for Western, Ashanti and Bono.
Where to find it: Select Western, Ashanti and Bono; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Cocoa. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ashanti · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero oil-palm farm counts for Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti.
Where to find it: Select Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Oil Palm. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Western · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero cocoa-farm counts for Western, Ashanti and Bono.
Where to find it: Select Western, Ashanti and Bono; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Cocoa. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Western · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero rubber-farm counts for Western, Central and Eastern.
Where to find it: Select Western, Central and Eastern; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Rubber. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Western · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero oil-palm farm counts for Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti.
Where to find it: Select Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Oil Palm. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bono · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero cocoa-farm counts for Western, Ashanti and Bono.
Where to find it: Select Western, Ashanti and Bono; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Cocoa. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bono · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero cashew-farm counts for Bono and Bono East.
Where to find it: Select Bono and Bono East; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Cashew. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bono · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero mango-farm counts for Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern.
Where to find it: Select Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Mango. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bono East · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero cashew-farm counts for Bono and Bono East.
Where to find it: Select Bono and Bono East; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Cashew. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Bono East · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero mango-farm counts for Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern.
Where to find it: Select Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Mango. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Central · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero rubber-farm counts for Western, Central and Eastern.
Where to find it: Select Western, Central and Eastern; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Rubber. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Central · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero oil-palm farm counts for Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti.
Where to find it: Select Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Oil Palm. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Eastern · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero rubber-farm counts for Western, Central and Eastern.
Where to find it: Select Western, Central and Eastern; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Rubber. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Eastern · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero oil-palm farm counts for Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti.
Where to find it: Select Western, Central, Eastern and Ashanti; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Oil Palm. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Eastern · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero mango-farm counts for Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern.
Where to find it: Select Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Mango. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Northern · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns positive cotton-farmer counts for Northern and Upper West.
Where to find it: Select Northern and Upper West; Types_of_industrial_crop = Cotton; Locality = All localities; Type_of_cropping_system = All cropping system. Result table “Farmers by Region, Types_of_industrial_crop, Locality and Type_of_cropping_system”; unit Farmers; source GSS-GCA.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farmers, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Northern · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero sheanut-farm counts for Northern, Savannah and Upper West.
Where to find it: Select Northern, Savannah and Upper West; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Sheanut. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output, and its tree-crop classification does not distinguish planted shea from stewardship or collection of naturally occurring trees. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results and does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Northern · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Statistics, Research and Information Directorate, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Ghana
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The MoFA report lists Northern, Upper West and Savannah among Ghana’s five leading soybean-producing regions based on average 2021–2023 production.
Where to find it: PDF p. 36, Figure 15: top five soybean-producing regions based on three-year average production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The report is the 2024 edition, but the file does not state a precise publication date. The figure identifies leading regions and aggregate values; it does not establish later output, production throughout a region, farm locations or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Northern · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero mango-farm counts for Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern.
Where to find it: Select Eastern, Bono, Bono East and Northern; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Mango. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Savannah · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero sheanut-farm counts for Northern, Savannah and Upper West.
Where to find it: Select Northern, Savannah and Upper West; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Sheanut. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output, and its tree-crop classification does not distinguish planted shea from stewardship or collection of naturally occurring trees. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results and does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Savannah · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Statistics, Research and Information Directorate, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Ghana
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The MoFA report lists Northern, Upper West and Savannah among Ghana’s five leading soybean-producing regions based on average 2021–2023 production.
Where to find it: PDF p. 36, Figure 15: top five soybean-producing regions based on three-year average production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The report is the 2024 edition, but the file does not state a precise publication date. The figure identifies leading regions and aggregate values; it does not establish later output, production throughout a region, farm locations or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Upper West · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns positive cotton-farmer counts for Northern and Upper West.
Where to find it: Select Northern and Upper West; Types_of_industrial_crop = Cotton; Locality = All localities; Type_of_cropping_system = All cropping system. Result table “Farmers by Region, Types_of_industrial_crop, Locality and Type_of_cropping_system”; unit Farmers; source GSS-GCA.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farmers, not planted area or output. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results displayed against current region names; it does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Upper West · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official census table returns non-zero sheanut-farm counts for Northern, Savannah and Upper West.
Where to find it: Select Northern, Savannah and Upper West; Nationality = Total; Type_of_crop = Sheanut. Result table “Tree Crop Holders by Region, Nationality and Type_of_crop”; unit Farms; source GSS-Agriculture Census.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The table reports farm counts, not planted area or output, and its tree-crop classification does not distinguish planted shea from stewardship or collection of naturally occurring trees. It is a 2024 StatsBank publication of 2017/18 census results and does not establish later activity, production throughout a region, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Upper West · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Statistics, Research and Information Directorate, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Ghana
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The MoFA report lists Northern, Upper West and Savannah among Ghana’s five leading soybean-producing regions based on average 2021–2023 production.
Where to find it: PDF p. 36, Figure 15: top five soybean-producing regions based on three-year average production.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The report is the 2024 edition, but the file does not state a precise publication date. The figure identifies leading regions and aggregate values; it does not establish later output, production throughout a region, farm locations or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Togo
Centrale · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry names Centrale, Kara, Plateaux and Savane as cashew-production regions and identifies eastern Plateaux and Centrale as preferred production areas.
Where to find it: Paragraph beginning “Les zones de production”, followed by the named preferred areas.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The harvest notice gives no observation period, regional quantities, farm locations or coverage within each region. ATI uses only the configured Centrale and Kara associations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Centrale · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Economy and Finance, Republic of Togo; table source: Nouvelle Société Cotonnière du Togo (NSCT)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 48 reports realized cotton seed production for Centrale, Kara and Savanes in both 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: PDF p. 70, Table 48: cotton seed quantities produced by region in 2022 and 2023, with 2024 forecasts.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: ATI excludes the table’s 2024 forecasts. Regional totals do not establish later output, production throughout a region, farm locations or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Centrale · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The plan identifies Savanes, Kara, Centrale and Plateau Est as the principal sesame-production regions and ranks Savanes first and Centrale third.
Where to find it: PDF p. 7, section 1.3 “Les zones de production”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The plan does not reproduce regional quantities or link the underlying 2022 analysis. The national chart is not regional evidence. ATI uses only the configured Savanes and Centrale associations and does not infer current volumes or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Centrale · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry identifies Centrale, Savanes and Plateaux as Togo’s principal soybean-producing regions and names five prefectures in those regions as sources of 60% of national production.
Where to find it: Paragraph beginning “Le soja est produit principalement”, followed by the prefectural concentration statement.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The article gives no observation period, publication date, regional quantities, farm locations or production boundaries. It says Kara is not a major production zone, so ATI does not add Kara from this source.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kara · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry names Centrale, Kara, Plateaux and Savane as cashew-production regions and identifies eastern Plateaux and Centrale as preferred production areas.
Where to find it: Paragraph beginning “Les zones de production”, followed by the named preferred areas.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The harvest notice gives no observation period, regional quantities, farm locations or coverage within each region. ATI uses only the configured Centrale and Kara associations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kara · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Economy and Finance, Republic of Togo; table source: Nouvelle Société Cotonnière du Togo (NSCT)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 48 reports realized cotton seed production for Centrale, Kara and Savanes in both 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: PDF p. 70, Table 48: cotton seed quantities produced by region in 2022 and 2023, with 2024 forecasts.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: ATI excludes the table’s 2024 forecasts. Regional totals do not establish later output, production throughout a region, farm locations or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kara · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo; Conseil Interprofessionnel de la Filière Karité du Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 1 estimates annual shea-kernel quantities and exploiting households for Savanes, Kara, Centrale and Plateaux-Est.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 10–11, section 3 and Table 1 “Production annuelle d’amandes de karité”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The source describes producers/collectors and collection channels, so ATI records wild collection rather than planted cultivation. The quantities are estimates from a 2018 study and do not establish current output, exact collection areas or supplier locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Savanes · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Economy and Finance, Republic of Togo; table source: Nouvelle Société Cotonnière du Togo (NSCT)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 48 reports realized cotton seed production for Centrale, Kara and Savanes in both 2022 and 2023.
Where to find it: PDF p. 70, Table 48: cotton seed quantities produced by region in 2022 and 2023, with 2024 forecasts.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: ATI excludes the table’s 2024 forecasts. Regional totals do not establish later output, production throughout a region, farm locations or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Savanes · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo; Conseil Interprofessionnel de la Filière Karité du Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 1 estimates annual shea-kernel quantities and exploiting households for Savanes, Kara, Centrale and Plateaux-Est.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 10–11, section 3 and Table 1 “Production annuelle d’amandes de karité”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The source describes producers/collectors and collection channels, so ATI records wild collection rather than planted cultivation. The quantities are estimates from a 2018 study and do not establish current output, exact collection areas or supplier locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Savanes · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The plan identifies Savanes, Kara, Centrale and Plateau Est as the principal sesame-production regions and ranks Savanes first and Centrale third.
Where to find it: PDF p. 7, section 1.3 “Les zones de production”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The plan does not reproduce regional quantities or link the underlying 2022 analysis. The national chart is not regional evidence. ATI uses only the configured Savanes and Centrale associations and does not infer current volumes or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Savanes · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry identifies Centrale, Savanes and Plateaux as Togo’s principal soybean-producing regions and names five prefectures in those regions as sources of 60% of national production.
Where to find it: Paragraph beginning “Le soja est produit principalement”, followed by the prefectural concentration statement.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The article gives no observation period, publication date, regional quantities, farm locations or production boundaries. It says Kara is not a major production zone, so ATI does not add Kara from this source.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Savanes · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo; Conseil Interprofessionnel de la Filière Mangue
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The table reports positive 2022 mango production for Plateaux Ouest, Plateaux Est and Savane, among other agricultural regions.
Where to find it: PDF p. 6, Table 1 “Statistique de production de la mangue en 2022”.
Geographic interpretation: The table uses the singular Savane; the configured administrative region is Savanes. This explicit alias is limited to tgo-savanes-region.
Limits: The table says the data were collected from regional producer presidents. It does not establish later output, production throughout a mapped region, farm locations or independent statistical verification.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Plateaux · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Water, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The plan says the forest zone lies largely in western Plateaux and lists oil palm among its principal cash crops.
Where to find it: PDF p. 13, section 1.3, paragraph 15 on the forest zone and its principal crops.
Geographic interpretation: The source identifies oil-palm cultivation in the western part of Plateaux. This establishes an association within the configured parent region, not production throughout it.
Limits: The passage identifies cultivation in a western subregion; it gives no production quantity, observation date, farm locations or evidence of activity throughout Plateaux. The programme period does not make the baseline description current through 2026.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Plateaux · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry identifies Centrale, Savanes and Plateaux as Togo’s principal soybean-producing regions and names five prefectures in those regions as sources of 60% of national production.
Where to find it: Paragraph beginning “Le soja est produit principalement”, followed by the prefectural concentration statement.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The article gives no observation period, publication date, regional quantities, farm locations or production boundaries. It says Kara is not a major production zone, so ATI does not add Kara from this source.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Plateaux · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development, Republic of Togo; Conseil Interprofessionnel de la Filière Mangue
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The table reports positive 2022 mango production for Plateaux Ouest, Plateaux Est and Savane, among other agricultural regions.
Where to find it: PDF p. 6, Table 1 “Statistique de production de la mangue en 2022”.
Geographic interpretation: The official table reports production separately for Plateaux Ouest and Plateaux Est. Plateaux Ouest is inside ATI’s configured parent Plateaux region; the association does not imply region-wide coverage.
Limits: The table says the data were collected from regional producer presidents. It does not establish later output, production throughout a mapped region, farm locations or independent statistical verification.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Benin
Borgou · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 550 reports cashew area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Collines and Atacora across three agricultural campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 346 (printed p. 345), Table 550: cashew production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Borgou · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Benin Ministry of Agriculture; table source: Association Interprofessionnelle du Coton
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 508 reports cotton area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Atacora and Alibori in 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Where to find it: PDF p. 321 (printed p. 320), Table 508: cotton area and production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Borgou · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The document describes shea as a wild-collected product and says the sector mainly involves women in Borgou/Alibori and Atacora/Donga.
Where to find it: PDF p. 34 (printed p. 33), section 3.2.1: shea as a wild-collected product and named departmental groupings.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The source gives paired department names and a sectoral collection association, not quantified department production, current collection volumes or exact park boundaries.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Borgou · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 333 reports sesame production in Borgou and Alibori during the reviewed three-campaign period.
Where to find it: PDF p. 225 (printed p. 224), Table 333: sesame production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The Borgou row reports small production followed by zero in the latest listed campaign; this supports only a historical association. The table does not name Collines. ATI does not infer current production or crop absence from these rows.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Borgou · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry sheet reports positive 2022 soybean production in Borgou, Donga, Collines, Atacora, Alibori and Plateau.
Where to find it: PDF p. 1, sections I–II: soybean holdings/producers and 2022 production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The sheet gives departmental totals but no precise publication date, farm locations or production boundaries. Historical production does not establish later output, production throughout a department or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Borgou · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The DSA document names Atacora, Donga, Borgou and Alibori as high-production mango zones; ATI uses the two configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 25–26 (printed pp. 24–25), section 3.1.5 and Fiche 5: mango production zones.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: This older production-zone description does not establish current output, regional quantities, production throughout a department or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Donga · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 550 reports cashew area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Collines and Atacora across three agricultural campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 346 (printed p. 345), Table 550: cashew production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Donga · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Benin Ministry of Agriculture; table source: Association Interprofessionnelle du Coton
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 508 reports cotton area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Atacora and Alibori in 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Where to find it: PDF p. 321 (printed p. 320), Table 508: cotton area and production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Donga · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The document describes shea as a wild-collected product and says the sector mainly involves women in Borgou/Alibori and Atacora/Donga.
Where to find it: PDF p. 34 (printed p. 33), section 3.2.1: shea as a wild-collected product and named departmental groupings.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The source gives paired department names and a sectoral collection association, not quantified department production, current collection volumes or exact park boundaries.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Donga · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry sheet reports positive 2022 soybean production in Borgou, Donga, Collines, Atacora, Alibori and Plateau.
Where to find it: PDF p. 1, sections I–II: soybean holdings/producers and 2022 production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The sheet gives departmental totals but no precise publication date, farm locations or production boundaries. Historical production does not establish later output, production throughout a department or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Collines · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 550 reports cashew area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Collines and Atacora across three agricultural campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 346 (printed p. 345), Table 550: cashew production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Collines · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry sheet reports positive 2022 soybean production in Borgou, Donga, Collines, Atacora, Alibori and Plateau.
Where to find it: PDF p. 1, sections I–II: soybean holdings/producers and 2022 production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The sheet gives departmental totals but no precise publication date, farm locations or production boundaries. Historical production does not establish later output, production throughout a department or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Atakora · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 550 reports cashew area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Collines and Atacora across three agricultural campaigns.
Where to find it: PDF p. 346 (printed p. 345), Table 550: cashew production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The ministry table uses the French spelling Atacora; the configured geoBoundaries feature uses Atakora. This explicit alias is limited to ben-atakora.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Atakora · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Benin Ministry of Agriculture; table source: Association Interprofessionnelle du Coton
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 508 reports cotton area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Atacora and Alibori in 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Where to find it: PDF p. 321 (printed p. 320), Table 508: cotton area and production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The ministry table uses the French spelling Atacora; the configured geoBoundaries feature uses Atakora. This explicit alias is limited to ben-atakora.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Atakora · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The document describes shea as a wild-collected product and says the sector mainly involves women in Borgou/Alibori and Atacora/Donga.
Where to find it: PDF p. 34 (printed p. 33), section 3.2.1: shea as a wild-collected product and named departmental groupings.
Geographic interpretation: The DSA document uses the French spelling Atacora; the configured geoBoundaries feature uses Atakora. This explicit alias is limited to ben-atakora.
Limits: The source gives paired department names and a sectoral collection association, not quantified department production, current collection volumes or exact park boundaries.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Atakora · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry sheet reports positive 2022 soybean production in Borgou, Donga, Collines, Atacora, Alibori and Plateau.
Where to find it: PDF p. 1, sections I–II: soybean holdings/producers and 2022 production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The DSA sheet uses the French spelling Atacora; the configured geoBoundaries feature uses Atakora. This explicit alias is limited to ben-atakora.
Limits: The sheet gives departmental totals but no precise publication date, farm locations or production boundaries. Historical production does not establish later output, production throughout a department or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Atakora · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The DSA document names Atacora, Donga, Borgou and Alibori as high-production mango zones; ATI uses the two configured associations.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 25–26 (printed pp. 24–25), section 3.1.5 and Fiche 5: mango production zones.
Geographic interpretation: The DSA document uses the French spelling Atacora; the configured geoBoundaries feature uses Atakora. This explicit alias is limited to ben-atakora.
Limits: This older production-zone description does not establish current output, regional quantities, production throughout a department or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Alibori · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Benin Ministry of Agriculture; table source: Association Interprofessionnelle du Coton
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 508 reports cotton area, yield and production for Borgou, Donga, Atacora and Alibori in 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Where to find it: PDF p. 321 (printed p. 320), Table 508: cotton area and production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: Historical departmental statistics do not establish current output, production throughout a department or farm locations. ATI records the association and period, not the table’s quantities.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Alibori · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The document describes shea as a wild-collected product and says the sector mainly involves women in Borgou/Alibori and Atacora/Donga.
Where to find it: PDF p. 34 (printed p. 33), section 3.2.1: shea as a wild-collected product and named departmental groupings.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The source gives paired department names and a sectoral collection association, not quantified department production, current collection volumes or exact park boundaries.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Alibori · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): Table 333 reports sesame production in Borgou and Alibori during the reviewed three-campaign period.
Where to find it: PDF p. 225 (printed p. 224), Table 333: sesame production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The Borgou row reports small production followed by zero in the latest listed campaign; this supports only a historical association. The table does not name Collines. ATI does not infer current production or crop absence from these rows.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Alibori · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry sheet reports positive 2022 soybean production in Borgou, Donga, Collines, Atacora, Alibori and Plateau.
Where to find it: PDF p. 1, sections I–II: soybean holdings/producers and 2022 production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The sheet gives departmental totals but no precise publication date, farm locations or production boundaries. Historical production does not establish later output, production throughout a department or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Plateau · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The report names Plateau among the departments where oil-palm production occurs.
Where to find it: PDF p. 42, section 2.4.3.1 and Figure 5: current production area and potential expansion.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The regional statement is current only to the report date and draws on older production-area maps. It does not give Plateau quantities, production throughout the department or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Plateau · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Direction de la Statistique Agricole, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Republic of Benin
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The ministry sheet reports positive 2022 soybean production in Borgou, Donga, Collines, Atacora, Alibori and Plateau.
Where to find it: PDF p. 1, sections I–II: soybean holdings/producers and 2022 production by department.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The sheet gives departmental totals but no precise publication date, farm locations or production boundaries. Historical production does not establish later output, production throughout a department or individual supplier activity.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Nigeria
Ondo · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cocoa-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ekiti, Ogun, Kogi and Cross River.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 166–167 (printed pp. 156–157), Table 9: stimulant-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ondo · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of rubber-reporting households in Ondo and Edo.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 168–169 (printed pp. 158–159), Table 10: other-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Cross River is excluded because its value is zero in this table; zero cannot prove crop absence. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ondo · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of oil-palm-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ogun, Cross River and Edo.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ondo · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ondo · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of mango-reporting households in Ondo, Ekiti, Kwara, Benue and Kaduna.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Osun · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cocoa-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ekiti, Ogun, Kogi and Cross River.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 166–167 (printed pp. 156–157), Table 9: stimulant-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Osun · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of oil-palm-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ogun, Cross River and Edo.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Osun · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ekiti · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cocoa-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ekiti, Ogun, Kogi and Cross River.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 166–167 (printed pp. 156–157), Table 9: stimulant-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ekiti · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ekiti · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of mango-reporting households in Ondo, Ekiti, Kwara, Benue and Kaduna.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ogun · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cocoa-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ekiti, Ogun, Kogi and Cross River.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 166–167 (printed pp. 156–157), Table 9: stimulant-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ogun · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cashew-reporting households in Ogun, Kogi and Kwara.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ogun · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of oil-palm-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ogun, Cross River and Edo.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Ogun · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kogi · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cocoa-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ekiti, Ogun, Kogi and Cross River.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 166–167 (printed pp. 156–157), Table 9: stimulant-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kogi · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cashew-reporting households in Ogun, Kogi and Kwara.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kogi · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Nigerian Export Promotion Council
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): NEPC includes Kogi, Kwara and Niger in its shea-producing areas.
Where to find it: “Major Producing Areas” list.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The list does not distinguish wild collection, cultivation and processing at state level. “Production” retains the publisher’s broad usage; this is not evidence of planted shea farms or current output.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kogi · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of sesame-reporting households in Benue, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara and Niger.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; sesame appears as “Beeni-seed/sesame”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Kwara’s estimate is positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kogi · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kwara · CashewSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cashew-reporting households in Ogun, Kogi and Kwara.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kwara · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Nigerian Export Promotion Council
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): NEPC includes Kogi, Kwara and Niger in its shea-producing areas.
Where to find it: “Major Producing Areas” list.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The list does not distinguish wild collection, cultivation and processing at state level. “Production” retains the publisher’s broad usage; this is not evidence of planted shea farms or current output.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kwara · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of sesame-reporting households in Benue, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara and Niger.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; sesame appears as “Beeni-seed/sesame”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Kwara’s estimate is positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kwara · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kwara · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of mango-reporting households in Ondo, Ekiti, Kwara, Benue and Kaduna.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Cross River · CocoaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cocoa-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ekiti, Ogun, Kogi and Cross River.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 166–167 (printed pp. 156–157), Table 9: stimulant-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Cross River · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Cross River State Government
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The state fiscal strategy names rubber among Cross River’s main crops and says plantation agriculture contributes through rubber.
Where to find it: PDF p. 15 (printed p. 14), section 2.A.4 “Cross River State Economy”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: This is a qualitative state-economy description in a fiscal-planning document, not a crop survey. It gives no observation period, planted area, output, farm locations or evidence of activity throughout the state.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Cross River · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of oil-palm-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ogun, Cross River and Edo.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Cross River · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Edo · Natural rubberSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of rubber-reporting households in Ondo and Edo.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 168–169 (printed pp. 158–159), Table 10: other-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Cross River is excluded because its value is zero in this table; zero cannot prove crop absence. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Edo · Oil palmSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of oil-palm-reporting households in Ondo, Osun, Ogun, Cross River and Edo.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Edo · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Niger · SheaSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
Nigerian Export Promotion Council
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): NEPC includes Kogi, Kwara and Niger in its shea-producing areas.
Where to find it: “Major Producing Areas” list.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The list does not distinguish wild collection, cultivation and processing at state level. “Production” retains the publisher’s broad usage; this is not evidence of planted shea farms or current output.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Niger · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of sesame-reporting households in Benue, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara and Niger.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; sesame appears as “Beeni-seed/sesame”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Kwara’s estimate is positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Niger · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Benue · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of sesame-reporting households in Benue, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara and Niger.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; sesame appears as “Beeni-seed/sesame”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Kwara’s estimate is positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Benue · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Benue · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of mango-reporting households in Ondo, Ekiti, Kwara, Benue and Kaduna.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kaduna · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cotton-reporting households in Kaduna and Katsina.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kaduna · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Kaduna · MangoSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of mango-reporting households in Ondo, Ekiti, Kwara, Benue and Kaduna.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 164–165 (printed pp. 154–155), Table 8: fruit-and-nut agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Katsina · CottonSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of cotton-reporting households in Kaduna and Katsina.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state, farm locations or commercial scale.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Katsina · SesameSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of sesame-reporting households in Benue, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara and Niger.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; sesame appears as “Beeni-seed/sesame”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Kwara’s estimate is positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
Katsina · SoybeanSource-supported association
A reviewed publication names this regional association. Support is limited to its stated activity, geography and period; it does not verify current production or individual farms.
National Bureau of Statistics (Nigeria)
Supporting passage (ATI paraphrase): The official survey table reports positive weighted estimates of soybean-reporting households in all twelve configured Nigerian states.
Where to find it: PDF pp. 162–163 (printed pp. 152–153), Table 7: oilseed-crop agricultural holdings by state, major season; soybean appears as “Soya beans”.
Geographic interpretation: The source names the configured region. This is an administrative association, not a match to farm boundaries.
Limits: The values are weighted sample-survey estimates of households in thousands, not a census, planted area or output. Several southern-state estimates are positive but small and should not be read as evidence of commercial scale. The report file is dated 2024; the catalogue record was added in 2025. The table does not establish later activity, production throughout a state or farm locations.
Association assessed 2026-09-09 · source review is separate from field verification.
How to read the weather signal
NASA POWER supplies gridded meteorological observations for representative points. ATI compares trailing 30-day rainfall and mean temperature against a 2014–2023 same-calendar-window baseline. Climate history is sampled weekly, with each observation representing a trailing 30-day window.
NORMAL, WATCH and ALERT are ATI screening tiers. Crop calendars and directional agronomic references help interpret the anomaly, but the result is not a farm measurement or a yield, production or price forecast. A stronger weather signal does not strengthen the evidence that a crop is present in the region.
Source documentation: NASA POWER: daily data documentation ↗
Coverage, freshness and confidence
The corridor overview distinguishes complete, partial and unavailable weather coverage. Missing observations must remain visible; they are not normal conditions. Use the observation date on the signal to understand how recent the underlying data is.
Corridor totals count available regional screens and ports on watch. They are not weighted by production, and ATI does not average rainfall anomalies across countries. Confidence in a weather interpretation is separate from the strength of evidence for a regional commodity association.
The configured counts below describe the scope of ATI’s monitoring. They are not counts of approved claims, farms or producing areas verified by a field survey.
| Country | Regions | Region/commodity pairs |
|---|---|---|
| Côte d’Ivoire | 11 | 26 |
| Ghana | 9 | 24 |
| Togo | 4 | 15 |
| Benin | 6 | 23 |
| Nigeria | 12 | 44 |
| Total | 42 | 132 |
Before making an operational decision
Read the date, methodology, source and limitations beside the signal. Confirm local crop timing, supplier conditions and collection access before changing procurement or transport plans.
PortWatch measures vessel-call activity and estimated trade flows. It does not establish congestion, a berth queue or the location of your shipment. Border history consists of periodic loaded-truck surveys, not current wait times. Live vessel tracking is not currently available.
Found a coverage issue? Contact ATI with the region, commodity and a link to the relevant public source.